Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 02:55

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Enhanced Box Score: Cubs 2, Reds 0 – May 31, 2025 - Bleacher Nation
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What is the best technique for inserting a tampon into one’s anus?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
LSU wins the 2025 Men's College World Series - NCAA.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Your Camper’s Water Tank Could Be Carrying Serious Diseases, Here’s How To Fix It - The Autopian
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What items do restaurant customers commonly try to steal?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All the ways Apple TV boxes do—and mostly don’t—track you - Ars Technica
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What everyday objects become surprisingly challenging to use in zero gravity?